Skip to main content

University of Reading Cookie Policy

We use cookies on reading.ac.uk to improve your experience. Find out more about our cookie policy. By continuing to use our site you accept these terms, and are happy for us to use cookies to improve your browsing experience.

Continue using the University of Reading website

University of Reading
Mobile search categories
Need Help?
Closing the awarding gap

Closing the awarding gap

The degree awarding gap in higher education (formerly ‘attainment gap’) is the difference in the proportion of two student groups receiving a first or second-class degree. 

Across the sector there are significant and enduring awarding gaps for students from minority groups.  Over a five-year span, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME*) students were consistently awarded fewer ‘good’ degrees than their white peers and in 2019/20 the BAME-white awarding gap was 9.9%. Awarding gaps are particularly pronounced for Black students and the average Black-white awarding gap was 18.7%.

According to Advance HE and the UUK/NSS Closing the Gap report on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Student Attainment at UK universities (2019) ‘unexplained’ gaps remain when student’s prior attainment (e.g., A-level grades or UCAS entry points) is considered. 

The awarding gap between students from the most and least deprived areas of the UK (as measured by IMD and POLAR rankings*) is also a sector-wide problem. In 2019/20 the gaps were 15.2% (IMD Q1:5) and 8.8% (POLAR Q1:5), representing a slight narrowing of the gap over five years. 

 The sector reported consistently lower rates of good awards for students with a declared disability. Over five years this gap was reduced from 2.8% in 2015/16 to 1.3% in 2019/20.

*‘BAME’ is an administrative term that does not refer to a single homogenous group. A wide variety of ethnic communities and lived experiences are collapsed into this label.

**The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative poverty between small areas of the UK, based on multiple factors such as income and employment rates. The Participation Of Local Area (POLAR) classification ranks areas of the UK based on rates of access to higher education.
 

Examining the awarding gap at Reading

Performance

The University of Reading’s target is to reduce the awarding gap between Black and minority ethnic students and white students to 5% in 2024/25. We also aim to eliminate the awarding gap between students from advantaged and disadvantaged backgrounds by 2024/25. Read more about these targets and our other commitments to underrepresented groups in our Access and Participation Plan.

Currently degree outcomes at the University of Reading resemble the national picture.  The gap between  for Black, Asian and minority ethnic students and white students decreased from 11.9% in 2015/16 to 8.2% in 2019/20. For most institutions, the gap between Black and white students is the largest; between 10% and 20% in 2019/20. At the University of Reading this gap was 13.2% in 2019/20 and 20.2% in 2018/2019 

The awarding gap between students from the most and least deprived areas (IMD Q1:5) increased from 8.6% in 2015/16 to a figure more in line with the sector average, 17.6%, in 2018/19. It then shrank to 11.2% in 2019/20. 
 
The university is monitoring its awarding gap for students with a declared disability despite a ‘reverse gap’ of -1.3% in 2019/20. Previous years were more aligned with other universities as between 2016/17 and 2018/19 this awarding gap moved from 3.4% to 2.1%.
 
As a result of the Covid pandemic considerable changes in assessment practices are likely to have reduced the size of awarding gaps, although it is difficult to pinpoint exactly what changes will have caused this based on one years’ worth of data. Regardless, it is important to note that the gaps remain significant and there are a range of structural contributing factors.

The Student Voice

 
Students at the University of Reading who participated in focus groups were largely unaware of the national ethnicity degree awarding gap. They were inclined to explain its existence through the lens of individual aptitude however some acknowledged the role of social and structural barriers (Wong, ElMorally & Copsey-Blake, 2021).  

Active listening has highlighted the role of racism and structural inequality in diminishing experience, belonging and success, such as a lack of BAME role models and discriminatory treatment.  

Students spoken to emphasise the restorative potential of ‘visible change’ as “it makes us feel like they care when what we’re saying is being acted on”. They cited the ways that teaching staff made them feel included and respected, such as by learning to pronounce their name or encouraging them to share their opinion in learning environments. However, students from all levels and backgrounds expressed frustration towards a perceived slow rate of change and an institutional ‘disinterest’ in Black, Asian and minority ethnic experiences. 
 

    What causes awarding gaps?

    HEFCE’s major report on causes of differential outcomes (Mountford-Zimdars et al, 2015) describes four broad categories of causal explanation:  

    • Teaching, learning and assessments

    • Relationships between students and HEIs/staff/employers

    • Social, cultural and economic capital

    • Psychosocial and identity factors

     

    NUS #ClosingTheGap report (Amos and Doku, 2019) highlights the following as notable factors within these categories: 

    • Institutional Culture - the extent to which staff and students acknowledge, understand, and discuss the challenges facing Black, Asian and minority ethnic students.

    • Representation - Low levels of ethnic diversity among staff can affect students’ belonging and overburden individuals.

    • Inclusive curriculum design and delivery - teaching and learning practices can impact how students from different ethnicities respond to their course, lecturers and tutors.

    • Belonging - Black, Asian and minority ethnic survey respondents repeatedly cited feeling out of place, HEFCE (2012) research found this is crucial to retention and success.

    • Prior Attainment - Differential attainment begins prior to university and tends to widen as students progress.

    • Information, advice and guidance - the ‘Race for Equality’ report (NUS, 2011) highlighted that researching where to study could be more of a challenge for Black, Asian and minority ethnic students and the guidance received was more likely to be described as ‘poor’.

    • Financial Considerations - the financial pressure of going to university is more salient to those from under-represented and lower socio-economic groups.

    • Preparedness for HE - Singh (2011) groups factors such as previous educational experiences and parental support under the theme of ‘preparedness for success’.

     

    Awarding gaps are complex and students may face multiple disadvantages. For instance, students from low socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to be first-generation entrants to higher education (Stevenson et al, 2019) and Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic students are more likely to describe their prior advice and guidance as ‘poor’ (NUS, 2011). This led to an initial tendency to locate the problem within the student rather than the institution (the ‘student deficit model’), but this has been roundly refuted in the literature (Amos and Doku, 2019).  

    Research from the Institute of Education at the University of Reading calls for diversifying how subjects are taught and assessed, proactively challenging structural barriers, improving belonging through greater representation, developing a shared commitment to eradicating all forms of racism and providing economic support for minority ethnic students (Wong, ElMorally & Copsey-Blake, 2021).
     
    Nuanced quantitative analysis and qualitative research are required to make visible the potential causes of differential attainment. Local understanding is especially important as awarding gap sizes vary between subjects.

    #ClosingTheGap (NUS, 2019) recommends strong leadership, collecting and analysing the data, changing the institution’s culture through conversations about race and developing racially diverse and inclusive environments as key tactics for closing awarding gaps.

     

    Principles for reporting on awarding gaps

    • Attainment data is made available to select colleagues through the Access and Participation data dashboard. School awarding gap representatives can access and disseminate this data.
    • The Office for Students requires higher education institutions in England to set outcomes targets for UK-domiciled undergraduate students as part of their Access and Participation plans. Therefore, external reporting excludes international students. However, when we are measuring, researching, reporting, and intervening internally, it is important to consider all student groups, including non-UK domiciled students. 
    • When considering awarding gaps for international students, the data will only include age on entry, disability, ethnicity, and sex. We do not have socio economic disadvantage indicators for international students. 
    • International students should be included in all work designed to reduce awarding gaps, particularly in relation to race. For example, a significant number of international students were recruited for the Inclusion Consultant scheme. Schools should consider their local context when designing work to reduce awarding gaps and consult with both home and international students when considering local solutions.

    What are we doing about the awarding gap?

    Eliminating degree awarding gaps at the University of Reading is a strategic priority and will require collective action from all staff. 

    A variety of initiatives and a whole institution approach are required, over a long term. Read about these targets and our other commitments to underrepresented groups in our Access and Participation Plan. 

    Our early focus is on supporting academic colleagues to assess the awarding gap and consider local actions for inclusion in STEAP plans. An Awarding Gap steering group has been assembled with senior representatives from each school. These representatives as well as Head of School, Head of Departments, School Directors of Teaching and learning and School Directors of Academic Tutoring   have access to a statistical dashboard from which they can draw attainment data pertaining to specific schools and departments. This group will enable colleagues to share good practice, resources and evidence surrounding awarding gaps and the progress mad.  

    ‘Belonging’ is a key determinant of performance and the university is working to provide a more inclusive student experience. For instance, “Chill and Chat” is a series of low-to-no alcohol events aimed at under-represented students.  

    Co-creating solutions by harnessing the student voice is essential.  We are currently advertising for a paid Inclusion Consultant.  Applications via CampusJobs.

    What can staff do about the awarding gap?

    Awarding gaps differ at the school, department and modular level and are influenced by students’ day to day experience. We invite all staff to join our collective approach to eliminating awarding gaps by 2024/25. 

    • Ask your Head Of School/School Director of Teaching and Learning or awarding gap representative about the local state of play

    • Ask your school management what opportunities there are for involvement in initiatives

    • Head to the Library foyer to view the physical exhibition of Racial justice In Teaching and Learning, launching24 January, 2022.

    • Explore guidance on how to provide a more inclusive teaching and learning experience. The Centre for Quality Support and Development can support you to develop the inclusivity of your teaching and learning.

    • Work with student partners on matters related to inclusion. Contact m.l.b.haine@reading.ac.uk to enquire about partnership activities with University of Reading’s Inclusion Consultants.

    • Read the Race Equality Review and its twenty recommendations.

    • Use available resources to start or continue your allyship journey.

    • Consult the following jargon buster as needed.

    • View the university’s collection of racial equality resources.


    Please email the Director of Student Success and Engagement, Anne-Marie Henderson a.henderson@reading.ac.uk for more information.

    References and Further Reading

    Amos V, Doku A (2019) Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Student Attainment at UK Universities: #closingthegap, Universities UK and National Union of Students.  (Last accessed: Oct 21) download

    Wong B, ElMorally R & Copsey-Blake M (2021) ‘Fair and square’: what do students think about the ethnicity degree awarding gap?, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45:8, 1147-1161, DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2021.1932773 download

    Mountford-Zimdars A, Sabri D, Moore J, Sanders J, Jones S & Higham L (2015), Causes of Differences in Student Outcomes (HEFCE). HEFCE, London. Available at: (Last accessed: Oct 21) download

    Stevenson J, O’Mahony J, Khan O, Ghaffar F and Stiell, B (2019) Understanding and overcoming the challenges of targeting students from under-represented and disadvantaged ethnic backgrounds. London: Office for Students. Available at: (Last accessed: Oct 21) download

    National Union of Students (2011) Race for Equality: A Report of the Experiences of Black Students in Further and Higher Education. London: National Union of Students. Available at: (Last accessed: Oct 21) download

     
     

Awarding Gap Steering Group

The University of Reading is committed to reducing these gaps and working with both our staff and student community to ensure all students regardless of their background can thrive and succeed. We need to move from words into action and I would encourage colleagues to read the Race Equality review and consider their role in the recommendations in that report. Each school will also have a nominated representative working on this agenda so please get in touch and ask them how to get involved locally.

Anne-Marie Henderson Director of Student Success and Engagement
  • Charitable Status
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Terms of use
  • Sitemap

© University of Reading